Wooten v. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Christopher Wooten appeals a district court decision dismissing his civil action for a declaratory judgment. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
Wooten filed his complaint for declaratory judgment in the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas seeking a ruling that his constitutional right to trial by jury, as enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Majeske v. Bay City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. Core Civic Corrections CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Jordan v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Whyte v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Wooten v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004