Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Bates

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 28, 2004No. 03-3896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Christopher Wooten appeals a district court decision dismissing his civil action for a declaratory judgment. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).

Wooten filed his complaint for declaratory judgment in the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas seeking a ruling that his constitutional right to trial by jury, as enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Majeske v. Bay City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Core Civic Corrections CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  2. Jordan v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
  3. Whyte v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Wooten v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API