Legal Opinion

Hurter v. Robbins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before the Hon. J. W. Lesesne.

1Opinion of the CourtChilton, J.

— This was a bill filed by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs to foreclose a mortgage alleged to have been executed by William Hurter, trustee of Eliza Horton, wife of Grustavus Horton. The trustee, the wife and her husband are all made parties. Process of subpoena issued on the 4th of March, 1851, and service was accepted by Eliza Horton on the 28th of the same month; but it does not appear to have been executed on any one else.

The defendants, Hurter and Eliza, answered on the 4th of April, 1851, averring that the mortgage debt belonged to one Thomas Belknap, administrator of John…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Greenway, Henry & SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  2. Davenport v. BartlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Pitfield v. GazzamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hale v. KinnairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Ex parte HelblingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. May v. DimickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API