Legal Opinion

Chocolas Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Handelsman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered September 23, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, adjudged that defendants were not entitled to an automatic price reduction in the purchase of real property pursuant to a settlement agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly determined that the terms of the settlement agreement between the parties were sufficiently ambiguous to warrant the introduction of extrinsic evidence, despite the existence of a merger clause (see, Concoff v Occidental Life Ins. Co., 4 NY2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Concoff v. Occidental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Moody v. SunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re VIOLATION OF RULE 28(D)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Oravec v. OravecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. New Whitehall Apartments LLC v. S.A.V. Associates Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  4. New Whitehall Apts. LLC v. S.A v. Assoc. Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  5. ORAVEC, MARIA v. ORAVEC, DAVID A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API