Staiger v. Klitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Robert H. Elitz and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Eings on the lltli day of November, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Eings County Special Term overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Carr, J.:
The parties to this action were copartners. They have dissolved their former relations by mutual agreements in writing. The final written agreement between them purports to state summarily the partnership assets and the mutual interests therein_of the respective partners. The plaintiff’s interest was stated as of the fixed sum of $32,061.21, and in consideration of the payment to him of the sum of $20,000 and delivery to him of two promissory notes aggregating $6,061.21, he released his copartners from all obligations to him arising out of the copartnership. In addition to the cash…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Carpenter v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- White v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Staiger v. KlitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Townsend v. MeyersNew York Supreme Court · 1910