Legal Opinion

Milillo v. Canfield

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 13, 1926No. 389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

The decree herein sought to he reversed is based upon an agreed statement of facts. It appears therefrom that Milillo, on May 5, 1925, submitted to the collector of internal revenue an application for a permit to use specially denatured alcohol at 3110 Jerome avenue, New York, in the manufacture of various toilet waters, specifying the formula of the denaturing, with an estimate that 1,100 wine gallons would be so used during a period of 30 days. After investigation, the application was denied. Thereupon a bill to review the refusal was filed. Both parties rested on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Rock v. BlairDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  3. De Milo Perfume Co. v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  4. Mt. Morris Distributing Corp. v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API