Legal Opinion

Matos v. Rohrer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1983No. 82-242PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, in this action for lien foreclosure. We affirm the District Court, but remand for a redetermination of fees and costs.

Plaintiff presents the following issues for review:

1. Whether the District Court erred in admitting parol evidence to “modify” the written agreement between the parties.

2. Whether Matos is entitled to an equitable quantum meruit for services and materials of which respondents received the benefit.

3. Whether the District Court erred in ruling that Matos’ mechanic’s lien was insufficient.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of JensenMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hellickson v. Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hornung v. Estate of LagerquistMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Winer v. Jonal CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Carkeek v. AyerMontana Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewistown Miller Construction Co. v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kravik v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Price Building Service, Inc. v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dck Worldwide Holdings Inc. v. CH SP Acquisition LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sheldon v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API