Legal Opinion

Athey v. City of Peru

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1974No. 72-236PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The plaintiffs as adjacent property owners filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to void an ordinance of the defendant City which reclassified the subject property from residential to commercial, and to enjoin its enforcement.

After plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order was denied, an evidentiary hearing was held on the merits of the complaint seeking a permanent injunction. The court denied the relief sought by the plaintiffs. The trial judge in a written opinion held that the ordinance in question was a new ordinance and not an amendment to the existing zoning ordinance;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Droste v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People ex rel. Abt v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Village of Park Forest v. WojciechowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. City of Metropolis v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Thompson v. Cook County Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. City of Mattoon v. MentzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Jones v. City of CarbondaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Geneva Residential Ass'n v. City of GenevaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API