Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Gleason

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ of entry, suomitted for the determination of the full court on agreed facts, tne substance of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The determination of this cause depends upon the construction of the second clause in the will of Henry Putnam, namely : “ I give, devise and bequeath to my two daughters, to wit, Julia, wife of Phinehas L. Page, Martha A., wife of Munroe Gleason, for the term of their natural lives, all my real estate of every name and nature, and wherever situated, to be held by them to their own use and behoof for life, as tenants in common, and at their death to their heirs and assigns forever.”

The question is, who are entitled to the remainder after the life estate of Mrs. Gleason (who has died leaving…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clarke v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Putnam v. StoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Lavery v. EganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. HoppinIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sherburne v. HowlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API