Legal Opinion
People v. Rehkopf
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 31, 1987No. 2—86—0274, 2—86—0275 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash
After a suppression hearing, the trial court granted a motion by defendants, Craig and Mary Lou Rehkopf, to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a Federal search warrant on the ground that the information contained in an underlying affidavit was stale and thus insufficient to establish probable cause. The State appeals, contending the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence.
On January 18, 1985, a warrant authorizing the search of defendants’ home in Aurora, Illinois, for two .22-caliber Baretta silencers and related documents was issued by a United States magistrate based on an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Leonard Jerome Bastida v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, La. State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Terry Louis GannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gaskins v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- People v. BohanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- People v. HancockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- People v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. HancockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.