Gus W. Lang v. Patent Tile Company, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
Defects of the District Court’s jurisdiction which are apparent on the face of the record must be noted by this Court sua sponte. Mansfield C. & L. M. Railway Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 382, 4 S.Ct. 510, 28 L.Ed. 462; Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583, 588, 59 S.Ct. 744, 83 L.Ed. 1001; Fennell v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 177 F.2d 737, 738; Riley v. Titus, 89 U.S. App.D.C. 79, 190 F.2d 653, 655. On the day of the oral argument counsel were advised of this Court’s doubts as to the jurisdiction of the District Court, and both parties have now furnished…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beghin-Say International Inc. v. Ole-Bendt RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- TB Harms Company v. EliscuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Muse v. MellinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Irvin Combs, Jr. v. Plough, Inc., Schering Plough, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Industrial Synthetics Corp. v. Swan Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.