Legal Opinion

Ivanhoff v. Teale

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1913No. 3,204PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ravalli County; J. B. Poindexter, a Judge of the Fifth Judicial District, presiding. Action by Peter Ivanhoff against Sarah C. Teale. 'Judgment for plaintiff; defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was brought to foreclose a statutory lien for a balance alleged to be due to plaintiff for services rendered'by him under a contract, by the terms of which he agreed to clear certain lands, situated in Ravalli county, belonging to defendant at a stipulated price of $25 per acre. Subsequent to the making of the original contract, its terms were, by mutual consent of the parties, extended so as to include other lands. The complaint alleges “that on the twentieth day of April, 1910, plaintiff entered upon the performance of said contract, and the defendant actually completed all of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGlauflin v. WormserMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Yerrick v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Eadie v. EadieMontana Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. GreenMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Callender v. Crossfield Oil SyndicateMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Enterprise Sheet Metal Works v. SchendelMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Johnson v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API