Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 17, 1993No. 92-CA-2966-MRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUDGEL, Judge:

This case presents an issue of first impression respecting the effect which the Kentucky Supreme Court’s adoption of the doctrine of comparative negligence may have upon the statutory subrogation rights of workers’ compensation insurers under KRS 342.700(1). Appellant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G), a workers’ compensation insurer, contends that the Jefferson Circuit Court erred in calculating the amount which USF & G was entitled to recover against a tortfeasor by way of subro-gation pursuant to KRS 342.700(1). We perceive no error in the court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hillman v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  3. National Biscuit Co. v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  2. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. SamplesKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. BushKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Weinberg v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  5. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API