Legal Opinion

State v. Ott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 1989No. 86-11-36089; CA A46957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant pleaded no contest to two counts of possession of controlled substances, methamphetamine and cocaine. ORS 475.992(4). The court entered a judgment of conviction on each count, suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on two concurrent three-year terms of probation. Defendant appeals, contending that the convictions should have been merged for sentencing and that he, therefore, should have been subject to a single term of probation. We affirm.

Defendant argues that simultaneous possession of two controlled substances within the same schedule 2 should result in a single…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. NessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. Camarena-VelascoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Pequeno v. Lowe's Home CentersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API