Legal Opinion

Horton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1959No. 29,755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant has appealed pro se from the judgment denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis.

Appellee has filed petition to dismiss the appeal by reason of appellant’s failure to comply with certain rules of this Court, to-wit, Rules 2-5, 2-17, and 2-19. Rule 2-5 was not complied with as no marginal nota*448tions were made on the transcript. Appellant failed to comply with Rule 2-17 as his brief does not contain a concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and objection relied upon, referring to the pages and lines of the transcript. Rule 2-19 also has not been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lake v. Bain, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McCrary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API