Legal Opinion

In re Sellers CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 2020No. C088942Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/2/20 In re Sellers CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- In re TARELL LAMONT SELLERS1 C088942 on Habeas Corpus. (Super. Ct. No. 01F09137) A jury found petitioner Tarell Lamont Sellers guilty of first degree…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Middleton v. McNeilSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. ChiuCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API