Legal Opinion

Stalker v. Stalker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1945No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 43,070PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Katherine M. Stalker, who obtained a pro confesso decree of divorce, has appealed from that portion of the decree which settled the property rights of the parties. The only question before us is whether or not the trial court erred in this particular and in barring plaintiff’s dower and refusing to award alimony and costs to her. As stated in Hallett v. Hallett, 279 Mich. 246.

“There is no rigid rule of division of property in divorce actions. ’ ’

The parties, both of whom had been previously married, were owners as tenants by the entireties of farming lands in Oceana county, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hallett v. HallettMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wells v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ross v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Cooley v. CooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Socha v. SochaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API