Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Hodel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 9, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 88-358 SSHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that defendant’s motion should be denied.
Background
Plaintiff is the only white (non-Indian) female Senior Executive Service employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.1 In 1986, she was employed as the Deputy Director/Comptroller, Office of Indian Education Programs, at the SES-4 level. Plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against on the basis of race, “was prevented from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Raeford D. WADE, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY, Etc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anstead v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- BAE Sys. Info. v. SpaceKey ComponentsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013