Legal Opinion

Shine v. Vega

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1999PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

In this wrongful death case, we must resolve the conflict between the right of a competent adult to refuse medi*457cal treatment and the interest of a physician in preserving life without fear of liability. In 1990, an invasive procedure, intubation,3 was forcibly performed on Catherine Shine (Catherine),4 a life-long asthmatic in the midst of a severe asthma attack. Dr. Jose Vega, an emergency physician at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), initiated the intubation without Catherine’s consent and over her repeated and vigorous objections. In 1993, Dr. Ian Shine, Catherine’s father and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Licata v. GGNSC Malden Dexter LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. In re a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. PughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API