Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Collins v. Down River Specialties, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1998No. Nos. 70840 and 70842Published

1ConcurrenceKarpinski, Judge

I concur in the main opinion, but write separately to address issues raised by the dissent. The trial court properly found that the murder and felonious assault committed by Vidal Brown with a firearm were not foreseeable by defendants. This lack of foreseeability negates both the existence of an underlying duty and the element of proximate cause necessary to establish a prima facie case of negligence.

This murder is significantly different from garden-variety cases involving barroom assaults, because the incident occurred among acquaintances who knew of the danger posed by Brown from his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. Warehouse Beer Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. King v. LindsayOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Mauter v. Toledo Hospital, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Polando v. VizziniOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Popovich v. PechkurowOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API