Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.J.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 13, 1993No. 92-3932PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
Juvenile appellant alleges that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress cocaine seized pursuant to a search conducted by a school resource officer employed by the Jefferson County Sheriffs Office. We hold that the officer did not have probable cause to conduct the search, and reverse.
On May 26, 1992, Officer William Massey, a school resource officer paid by the sheriffs office was passing by the principal’s office at Howard Middle School. Massey noticed several students in the office, and the Principal, Pink Hightower, told the officer he wanted the students…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M. J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. D.T.W.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- In the Interest of F.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. Angelia D.B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. N.G.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Thomas v. BarzeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- J.A.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- AJM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.