Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2002No. 45S05-0106-PC-282PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

In his post-conviction relief petition, Orlando Martin alleges ineffective assistance of counsel because his appellate attorney mentioned, but did not brief, a claim that the trial court improperly gave the jury an instruction after deliberations had begun. Concluding that this error neither constituted deficient performance nor prejudiced Martin's case, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.

Facts and Procedural History

Martin was charged with murdering Donald Stewart and tried before a jury in 1992. The evidence revealed that Martin sought out Stewart because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Joseph J. Scott v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API