Martin v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
In his post-conviction relief petition, Orlando Martin alleges ineffective assistance of counsel because his appellate attorney mentioned, but did not brief, a claim that the trial court improperly gave the jury an instruction after deliberations had begun. Concluding that this error neither constituted deficient performance nor prejudiced Martin's case, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.
Facts and Procedural History
Martin was charged with murdering Donald Stewart and tried before a jury in 1992. The evidence revealed that Martin sought out Stewart because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Joseph J. Scott v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.