Legal Opinion

Emery v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1909No. 191PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was convicted for perjury, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The facts show that appellant was a witness in the case of Thompson v. State, who, during his trial for the crime of rape, used the defendant as a witness, who testified to certain facts upon which the perjury alleged in the indictment is based. Appellant’s contention is that he is not guilty of perjury, conceding his testimony to be false. The facts show that Thompson, defendant in the rape case, was on bail; that during the trial and after the first…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Drew v. Harrison & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Ex Parte SnodgrassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Ex Parte TinsleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Millsap v. LozanoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. State v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Boreing v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API