Legal Opinion
In re McDowall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 22, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
*247Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by the Third Department on January 23, 1989, and formerly maintained an office for the practice of law in Buffalo. He was suspended for two years and until further order of this Court by order entered December 27, 2000, for misconduct that included conversion of client funds and negotiating through his attorney trust account Canadian checks drawn against insufficient funds (.Matter of McDowall, 279 AD2d 216 [2000]). Respondent was personally served on December 29, 2000, with a certified copy of the suspension order and a copy…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re RudinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re McDowallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re McDowallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re McDowallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re McDowallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re McDowallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018