Francis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm Jean Pierre Francis’ conviction, but remand for the entry of a proper nunc pro tunc order finding Francis competent to stand trial. Although the trial court found Francis competent to proceed to trial after previously having found him to be incompetent, the only written confirmation thereof is contained in a document entitled “Court Minutes/Order” signed by the deputy clerk, not by the trial court. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of a proper written order of competence, nunc pro tunc. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.212(c)(7) (stating: “If, at any time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corbitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- St. Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- St. Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013