Legal Opinion

Tri-State Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Johnson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1976No. 13774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neely, Justice:

This mandamus proceeding was brought for the purpose of interpreting the local option election provision of the West Virginia Racing Statute, W. Va. Code, 19-23-20 (1975). We granted a rule to show cause because the statute is highly ambiguous and required an interpretation before the November 1976 general election. We deny relief.

Relator, Tri-State Greyhound Racing, Inc., received tentative approval from the West Virginia Racing Commission on July 31, 1976 for the construction of a dog racetrack in Cabell County, West Virginia, and caused notice of the tentative approval to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Simms v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Riffle v. City of ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. W.VA. Nonintoxicating Beer Commr. v. TavernWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. IveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hartley Hill Hunt Club v. County Commission of Ritchie CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tri-State Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API