Legal Opinion
Nunez v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2010No. 06-70219PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
ORDER
The dissent is amended to replace the citation to Wooten v. Superior Court on 2409 of the slip opinion with the following: Wooten v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 195 (Cal.Ct.App.2001) (setting aside an information charging two individuals for pimping and pandering where defendants hired women to perform sexual acts on each other and not customers);
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
I
Once again we face the question of what is moral turpitude: a nebulous question that we are required to answer on the basis of judicially established…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Barbosa v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Javier Castrijon-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Robles-Urrea v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.