Legal Opinion
United States v. Pahmer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
These cross-motions for summary judgment raise the issue as to whether a suicide note left by a person insured under the National Service Life Insurance Act, 38 U.S.C.A. § 802(g) is sufficient to constitute a change of beneficiary under the policy. .
The action is one of interpleader brought by the government to determine who is entitled to be considered as the beneficiary of the policy. The defendants are, respectively, Eve B. Pahmer, the widow, and Eva Pahmer, the mother, of Dr. Marcel Pahmer, the insured. Both defendants have moved for summary judgment. As there are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Shapiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Cohn v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Kendig v. KendigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Eve B. Pahmer, Eva PahmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
- Sibille v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Erickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967