Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Gibbs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1872No. 209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Eleventh Judicial District of Claiborne. J. F. Pierson, Judge ad hoe, in place of Fgan, Judge, recused.

1Opinion of the CourtLudeling, C. J.

In March, 1860, J. J. Wilder & Co. executed two promissory notes, each for $4407 0.9, payable respectively in twenty-four and thirty-six months after date, to the order of Rogers & Woodall; and at the same time Rogers & Gibbs and J. Gibbs wrote their names on the back of said notes. Rogers & Woodall, the payees, have never indorsed the notes. Jasper Gibbs is now sued by the payees as surety. The defendant, without pleading to the merits, filed the plea of prescription against the notes. There was judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed. The notes are prescribed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moies v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Josselyn v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Case of M'Nair's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  4. Smith v. GortonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
  5. Lawrence v. OakeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. M. Dresser Co. v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Alfred Hiller Co. v. Hotel Grunewald Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Barnes v. Park Place Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Beshel v. N. O. Thrift Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API