Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 7, 1944No. 38691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This is the third appeal in this partition suit. The others are reported in 348 Mo. 1041, 156 S. W. (2d) 610 and 350 Mo. 152, 165 S. W. (2d) 676. The first opinion fully states the facts. All the coparceners are heirs of Amanda E. Adams, the source of title — except the plaintiff-appellant, widow of one of Mrs. Adams’ sons who postdeceased her childless and intestate. Af the first trial the respondent Melvin Adams, another son, (hereinafter called the respondent) filed a cross-bill claiming title to the whole tract through a resulting trust, and alternatively seeking credit for taxes on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Devoto v. DevotoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Tillman v. MeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacK v. MacKSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Farmer v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Henry v. StewardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Mitchell v. McClellandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API