Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Leuthongchak

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2001No. 00-CV-161PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

This appeal arises out of a traffic accident in the District of Columbia involving a two-car collision. A jury found appellant Johnson’s negligence to be the proximate cause of the accident and awarded damages against him. In the course of the proceedings, the trial court ruled that evidence of appellee Leuthongchak’s payment by mail of the civil fine for a traffic ticket, 1 given for allegedly failing to yield the right of way, was inadmissible as a matter of law. 2 We follow the virtually unanimous holdings of courts in this country rejecting such evidence and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Knight v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Briggeman v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Chaabi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Chamontae A. Walker & Corey D. Yates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Stevenson v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re TidwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kovach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API