Legal Opinion
Youngstown & O. R. R. v. Halverstodt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1926No. 4532PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Youngstown & Ohio River Railroad Company owns a line of railroad 37 miles in length .wholly within the state of Ohio. Trains are electrically operated on the road. On January 24,1924, Halverstodt, plaintiff below, was a brakeman on a freight train of the company. The termini of his run were East Liverpool and Leetonia. West Point was an intermediate station. A switch led from, the main line at that point to a tipple at the mine of the Saeger Puel Company. On the opposite side of the track there was a switch siding, known as “long siding.” A short distance south of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McNatt v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Rogers v. Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Siegel v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Rice v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.