Duncan v. State

Duncan appeals from his judgment and sentences for delivery of cocaine and possession of cocaine. He argues the trial court •erred in denying defense counsel’s request for sanctions (the exclusion of two state witnesses’ testimony) because of a violation of the rule of sequestration. There is no error in this case.

*414The key fact issue at trial was the identification of Duncan as the seller and possessor of the drugs sold to two police undercover agents, who testified at trial. Officer Dossett viewed the videotape made at the time of the drug purchase, but could not identify Duncan as the…