Legal Opinion

Estate of Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 10518PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

The appellants herein have taken an appeal from a judgment based on an order sustaining the demurrer of respondents without leave to amend. Appellants filed a petition in the superior court for a refund of a portion of an inheritance tax paid by the estate of Matilda Brown, deceased, also known as Mathilda Brown and as Mathilda A. Brown. On June 1, 1909, the deceased made a deed of gift of an undivided one-fourth interest in two pieces of property, the Broadway property and the Fourteenth Street property in the city of Oakland, county of Alameda, to her children, Mathilda E. Brown, Annie F.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Forward Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Dwight v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API