Bank of the United States v. Halstead
Supreme Court of the United States
This cause was argued at the last term, by the same counsel with the preceding case of Wayman, Southard, (ante p. 1.) and continued to the present term for advisement.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
This case comes up on a division of opinion of the Judges of the Circuit Court of the United-States for the District of Kentucky, upon a motion there made to quash the return of the Marshal upon a venditioni exponas issued in this cause. The writ commanded, the Marshal to expose to sale certain articles of property therein particularly specified; and, among other things, two hundred acres of land of Abraham Venable, one of the defendants. The Marshal, in his return, states substantially, that he had exposed to sale, for cash, the lands mentioned in the writ, no endorsement having been made on…
2Cited by129 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.