Legal Opinion

In re Aurora M.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 23, 2018No. Docket: Ken-17-308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] The father of Aurora M. and Juelz M. appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Augusta, E. Walker, J.) terminating his parental rights to the children pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4055(l)(A)(l)(a) and (B)(2)(a), (b)(í)-(iv) (2017). 1 He contends that the guardian ad litem failed to satisfy his statutory obligations to conduct an in-person interview with the father and to notify the father’s attorney that the father was incarcerated before the cease reunification order went into effect. 2 See 4 M.R.S. § 1554 (2017); 3 22 M.R.S. § 4005(1) (2017). We disagree and affirm the judgment.

I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Doris G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. In re M.C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. In Re Hannah S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. In Re William P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. In re Aubrey R.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cynthia (Martin) Remick v. Kevin MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Matthew W. Buck v. Lisa H. BuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. In re Child of Emily K.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. In Re Child of Danielle H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API