Legal Opinion

Fottler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1996No. 95-2083PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Fred Fottler, a federal prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various other statutes. Mr. Fottler proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. He alleged in his complaint that the means used to arrest and convict him were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Peter R. Perez v. Edward SifelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Schafer v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Duffield v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Theede v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Joseph Curry v. Brianne YacheraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Beck v. City of Muskogee Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API