Legal Opinion
United States v. Darryl Arlene Grant
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 29, 2005No. 04-12268PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Darryl Arlene Grant appeals his sentence for producing and possessing counterfeit corporate checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 514. On appeal, he argues the district court clearly erred by calculating an intended loss of $230,009.54 and imposing a 12-level sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(l)(G). 1 Specifically, he contends the district court’s intended loss calculation should not have included the $182,899.54 total face value of photocopies of stolen corporate checks found in his possession. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts are not in dispute. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl GisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lloyd R. HaggertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William C. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Adetokunbo AdejumoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hoffman-VaileCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PadronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Krishnaswami Sriram, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.