Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tunstall

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 14, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to judgment of corporation court of city of Lynch-burg rendered December term, 1888, in a proceeding wherein A. A. Tunstall was plaintiff, and the commonwealth was defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

The judgment here complained of was rendered in favor of A. A. Tunstall against the commonwealth of Virginia, upon a petition filed for the identification aud verification of certain coupons under sections 406, 407, and 408 of the Code of Virginia of 1887, by which it was ascertained and adjudged that the said coupons, to the aggregate amount of $915, which had been theretofore tendered by the said A. A. Tunstall to John W. Bransford, treasurer of the city of Lynchburg, in payment of taxes due to the commonwealth of Virginia, are the genu*373ine, legal, past dne coupons cut from the bonds of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. HurtSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeVoss v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  2. DeVoss v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  3. DeVoss v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API