Legal Opinion

Banyan Mezzanine Fund II, Lp v. Rowe

North Carolina Business Court

Decided May 10, 2016No. 16-CVS-3701Published

1Opinion of the Court

Banyan Mezzanine Fund II, LP v. Rowe, 2016 NCBC 35. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 16 CVS 3701 BANYAN MEZZANINE FUND II, LP; ) BANYAN EQUITY INVESTORS II, INC.; ) CENTRAL ILLINOIS ANESTHESIA ) SERVICES, LTD. PROFIT SHARING PLAN ) TRUST; MICHAEL DEANDA; DATHREE; ) and ACM CAPITAL FUND I, LLC, ) Individually and as to the Members of ) TOWERCOMM, LLC, Derivatively on Behalf ) OPINION AND ORDER of the TOWERCOMM, LLC, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL ROWE and BILL EASTON, ) Defendants. ) THIS CAUSE, designated a mandatory complex…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API