Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Cleveland v. Luttner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1915No. Nos. 14681 to 14685Published

Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

1DissentJones, J.

The question involved in this case is whether a discharged employe, who has been afterwards reinstated, can recover his salary from the city when he performed no service for the city during the time of his discharge, and where the city had employed another to take the place of the *496discharged employe and paid his successor the salary for such services. Stated in another form, can the city be compelled to pay twice for the same services under the circumstances related ? .

'The rule in this behalf is stated by Judge Dillon in his-Municipal Corporations (5 ed.), volume 1, section 429, as follows:

“F…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Bullis v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Commissioners of Saline Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Selby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API