Bartholomew v. Thieding
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberRY, C. J.
The question presented is whether or not the memorandum upon the note of December 2, 1935, was, as the trial court found, an assignment pro tanto of the insurance money to become due to the plaintiff, Bessie Bartholomew. One of the leading cases upon equitable assignment is Christmas v. Russell (1871), 14 Wall. 69, 20 L. Ed. 762. In that case it was held that an agreement to pay out of a particular fund, however clear in its terms, is not an equitable assignment; that to constitute an equitable assignment the transfer must be of such a character that the fundholder can safely pay the assignee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Jones Trustee Etc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Board of Com'rs Okfuskee County v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bailey v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- Yorgan v. DurkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- McIntyre v. CoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Matter of Richland Bldg. Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Schubbe Resch Chiropractic & Physical Therapy Centers v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.