Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ray L. Corona and Rafael L. Corona

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1986No. 86-5287PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case is whether retrial of the defendants following a hung jury violates the double jeopardy clause when there has been a superseding indictment which expands upon the original charges. We hold that there is no violation of the double jeopardy clause.

Defendants Ray Corona and Rafael Corona were charged in the original indictment with numerous counts of racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, as well as various related predicate offenses which were all incorporated into the racketeering and racketeering conspiracy counts. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Wendell Cole, Howard Masters, B.K. Taylor, Larry Masters, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerry WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Roger Benton (87-5355) And, Marion D. Campbell (87-5361), DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Stovall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. United States v. MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Rafael L. Corona, Ray L. CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API