Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HRANKA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1978No. ID 2644PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2644 MATTER OF HRANKA. In Section 212(d)(3) Proceedings A-20925982 Decided by Board April 6, 1978 (1) In an application for advance permission to enter as a nonimmigrant pursuant to section 212(d)(3) of the Act, there is no requirement that the applicant's reasons for wishing to enter the United States be "compelling." (2) An application under section 212(d)(3XB) requires a weighing of at least three factors: (1) the risk of harm to society if the applicant is admitted; (2) the seriousness of the applicant's immigration law, or criminal law violation, if any; and (3) the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HamdiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Victor Jimenez-Rodriguez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Finest Meridor v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. KHANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. GomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API