Legal Opinion

People v. Fonda

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. (Pealer, J.) Information for embezzlement. Respondent convicted. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The complaint against the respondent in this case is criminal, and was made by Charles W. Cond, president of the Farmers’ National Bank of Constantine, in behalf of the bank, for the larceny and embezzlement of its funds, while the respondent was engaged in its employment as clerk or servant.

The Farmers’ National Bank of Constantine, at the time the alleged crime was committed, was “ an incorporated bunking institution, organized and existing under the laws of the United States providing for the creation of national banking associations.” ' ’

■The information against respondent contains nine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Commonwealth v. TenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. . WelchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. In re MurphyWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. BurkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. BardwellMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. Wilkin WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API