Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lincoln Construction, Inc. v. Thomas J. Parker & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1979No. 77-2278-L-3, CA 11335Published

1DissentButtler, J.

I would affirm the judgment; therefore I dissent.

The majority states the applicable law correctly and also concludes correctly that plaintiff, under its subcontract with defendant, agreed to be bound by the determination of volume of rock crushed and stockpiled as made by Weyerhaeuser or the Forest Service. However, a fundamental requirement to attributing finality to a determination by a third party is that the delegation be clearly expressed, Highway Com. v. Heintz Constr., 245 Or 530, 423 P2d 175 (1967), and a reasonable corollary to that rule is that the provision be adhered to strictly.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Progress Quarries, Inc. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API