Legal Opinion

First Huntington Nat. Bank v. Salt Lick Deposit Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1932No. 5906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the amended petition of the plaintiff below states a cause of action. Although an answer and reply had been filed, the action was dismissed as upon demurrer to the petition. The parties have not argued, and we do not therefore consider, whether the answer of the defendant set forth facts constituting a valid defense, or whether the reply of the plaintiff properly raised any issues of fact or law.

The petition as amended sets forth in substance that prior to maturity the plaintiff, First Huntington National Bank,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Early v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ungerleider v. Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API