Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Syracuse University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Mark B. Pierce (plaintiff) when he fell from a ladder while repairing a roof on the *871campus of defendant, Syracuse University (SU). SU commenced a third-party action seeking contribution and indemnification from plaintiffs employer, Josall Syracuse, Inc. (Josall). Under its contract with SU, Josall agreed to indemnify SU against claims for injuries arising out of the work and to obtain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hailey v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Goffredo v. Bay Street Landing AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Valentin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Layaw v. Maguire Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruno v. Price Enterprices., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kvandal v. Westminster Presbyterian Society of Buffalo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997