Legal Opinion

Crooker v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 13, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-1717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, plaintiff’s opposition thereto, defendant’s response to plaintiff’s opposition, and plaintiff’s supplemental memorandum.

The basis for defendant’s motion is that plaintiff has failed to exhaust the administrative remedies that are available to him and so allege such exhaustion in the complaint. Based on all the evidence that is before the Court, including, but not limited to, plaintiffs December 11, 1983 letter to defendant requesting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morpurgo v. Bd. of Higher Ed. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Victor H. Hedley and Mariana P. Hedley v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Satra Belarus, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dale v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Rodriguez-Cervantes v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Crooker v. United States Marshals ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API