United States v. Ohrt
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Dissent
Judge LEWIS, with whom Senior Judge FORAY, Senior Judge SESSOMS and Judge BLOMMERS join
(dissenting):
We concur that the commander’s opinion was based on something more than the offenses of which the appellant was convicted and, thus, was proper insofar as the guideline enunciated in United States v. Homer, 22 M.J. 294 (C.M.A. 1986), is concerned. However, since his opinion addressed potential for continued Air Force service, we believe that it effectively constituted a recommendation that a bad conduct discharge be imposed. Appellate counsel for both sides have agreed that the receipt of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. StrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. JenkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. TiptonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. BenoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.