Town of State Center v. Barenstein
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Cotort. The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor in violating an ordinance of the town of State Center, and was adjudged to pay a fine of $25. Erom the judgment he appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
-The defendant was charged with peddling goods from house to house on tlie streets of State Center, without first procuring a license therefor, contrary to the ordinances in such case made and provided. The defendant admits that he peddled. goods as charged, and without procuring a license as provided by the ordinances of the town, but he contends that the ordinances have no validity, for the reason that the same are unreasonable and unauthorized. It is not necessary to set out the ordinances in full. It is sufficient to say that provision is made for licensing certain occupations, and, among…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Village of Carthage v. . FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Cicero Lumber Co. v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Commonwealth v. MaletskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.